![]() |
|---|
The Principles of Primary Balance
An understanding of the terminology used in T.O.E - The Order Explained is required for best assimilation of this subject. The following prophecy reiterates the importance of the terminology used and has been confirmed again and again: "Through the coincidence of words I will teach you." The Principles of Primary Balance and Field Quanta Relationships Part Five - Inertia and The Graviton To get to the root cause of inertia it is necessary to understand the difference between Absolute (real) Space, Energy, Time and Truth (S.E.T.T) and Relative (Co.) Space, Energy, Time and Truth (Co.S.E.T.T). Absolute S.E.T.T, relevant to permanent mass, applies only to perts whether they are alone or in combinations. It also applies to light and all electromagnetic radiation. Co.S.E.T.T pertains to all physical created mass constituted of gravitons. Perts are navigated through the absolute interspaces of the plenum-matrix by the absolute energy of facet radiance pulsing in the vitalities of the facetial spindle complex at the absolute frequency of 'Cor-time'. These absolutes determine that every pert is at exactly the same time singularly in absolute truth with the centre of an interspace at the pulse phase of the P.U.F. Such order is the surety behind the laws (principles) of the real and the relative. As stated in part four of this series, gravitons are made up of perts drawn together into multiple binary systems revolving (orbiting) around a common centre of low pressure plasma - P.G.H.S. This low pressure is created by the perts drawing rights within the cube geometry of the plenum-matrix. It was also stated that the graviton was sausage shaped, meaning that it's length is greater than the largest of the various lamina orbit diameters of the perts that make up its form. Now the question can be asked, how can a pert orbit in a circular or elliptical curved path in a matrix of absolute cubed spaces? The answer is: it can't and it doesn't, and therein lies a basis for inertia. To explain this bold statement we must refer to the relevant words of prophecy on the subject. The most descriptive of these was given incidentally within a message about a certain prismatic optical activity, which was compared to the small dance steps of the minuet. When this comparison was linked to an earlier message, which described perts as 'light-like' particles, it became obvious that the same fundamental need (rule) for steps also applied to them when they are bound in binary systems. These steps were quoted as "zig-zagged", an expression that was followed by the phrase "I onus-ly" and/or "I honestly." 'I' refers to God Himself, who alone is Absolute and exists of Himself. 'Onus-ly' literally designates that the onus, the burden of 'response-ability' for navigating all the untold perts throughout the infinite universe is His, for He alone is Omnipotent and Omnipresent of Being. 'I honestly' confirms God's faithfulness to the task and substantiates His commitment to share His life, His Being with us. 'Zig-zagged' explains the need for the perts to tack or be tacked at right angles through the matrix in order to complete an orbit. This tacking manoeuvre was referred to in another message as "quarterly moments" - four turning moments of rotation - which when added to the four straight paths perform an octave to complete the crucial circuit of alignment as a 'posit-ation' of form. God called this form "locomotation" - local rotating motion - which means: the localising, or confining of pert movements into intricate patterns of loops and orbits. As a form 'locomotation' is based on an ideal gravitational configuration (graviton) to fit the circumstance of its placement; a configuration so complex, so synchronised that it resists all changes of state, a resistance proportional to its pert count (mass). In God's own beautiful words:
Of all the words within this message the one that stands out in importance with regard to the total context is the word 'given' in the phrase - "My given time." In the next installment we continue with explanations on the relationship between inertia, gravity and 'given time'. Copyright © 1999-2006 Mantelet Communications. All rights reserved. This text may be downloaded or printed out for private reading. Mantelet directs that portions of text not be taken out of context for purposes of quotation and/or analysis. It may not be uploaded to another Internet site or published, electronically or otherwise, without express written permission from Mantelet.
|